![]() The Supreme Court of Canada said that reasonable doubt falls much closer to absolute certainty than to proof on a balance of probabilities. ![]() Based on reason and common sense that logically connects to the clear and convincing evidence. There must be a very high probability of the defendant’s guilt. To satisfy BRD the judge, or the judge and jury, must be more than sure, they must be closer to absolute certainty. Personal opinions or feelings are insufficient for reasonable doubt. ![]() Where the preponderance of the evidence, or the lack of evidence presented, fails to clearly demonstrate the guilt of an individual reasonable doubt may exist. Reasonable doubt occurs where the guilt of the accused falls short of absolute certainty. But what exactly constitutes Beyond a Reasonable Doubt? What is the Beyond a Reasonable Doubt? A court cannot find that the defendant is guilty of a crime unless the evidence satisfies this standard of proof. Guilty Beyond a Reasonable Doubt (BRD) is the standard for convictions in a criminal trial.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |